Tuesday, March 21, 2006

2005 Base API Data Published

Seems like it's all-API-data-all-the-time around here. But really, it is an accident. When round 1 enrollment results were announced I thought it might be useful to compile the available API data. Now that the 2005 Base data is available, I will quickly update the spreadsheets and republish.

Meanwhile, a quick review of the 2005 data shows that SFUSD is doing very well. Perhaps the most remarkable measure of SFUSD performance has been identified by sfschools list member Luis Alegria. He computed a weighted average for the Similar Schools Rank in this sfschools post, Comparative School District Performance
Population-adjusted Similar School Ranks
Fontana Unified7.996
San Francisco Unified7.392
Inglewood Unified7.374
Riverside Unified7.261
Sacramento City Unified6.516
Fremont Unified6.439
Garden Grove Unified6.407
Elk Grove Unified6.389
West Contra Costa Unifie6.353
Long Beach Unified5.500
San Bernardino City Unif5.266
Glendale Unified5.257
Orange Unified5.172
San Jose Unified4.944
San Diego Unified4.845
Los Angeles Unified4.595
Capistrano Unified4.581
Oakland Unified4.043
Lodi Unified3.769
San Juan Unified3.356
Chino Valley Unified3.000
Mt. Diablo Unified2.894
Fresno Unified2.875
Gives you some idea of where SFUSD sits - I've got the big districts there, some local ones, and the best-performing ones I've found. Fontana is something; its also something that SFUSD is in that company.
No doubt about it, this is great news for the district and even better news for the students. Kudos to all the hard working professionals for their hard work and commitment to our students.

I will add one footnote to this statistic. The method for calculating the Similar Schools Rank has changed this year. In previous years "Similar schools ranks have been confusing for some schools when the 100 schools with which they are compared do not appear similar", according to the Information Guide published with the new data. So they have added six new variables into the calculation to help determine truly similar schools:
  • % Grade span enrollments
  • % Students in GATE programs
  • % Students with disabilities
  • % Reclassified fluent-English-proficient students
  • % Migrant education students
  • % Students in reduced class size for full day
Some of these changes may have helped measure where SFUSD teachers and schools are successfully meeting particular challenges. This does not discount the outstanding similar schools result noted above, but it does mean we should be wary of comparing this result with the same statistic from prior years. The state is learning how to measure similar schools' performance better. Which clearly is good news for the educators of SFUSD.

3 Comments:

At Tue Mar 21, 10:46:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If this is legitimate, the news should be spread far and wide. More likely, though, it simply reflects the reduced emphasis on race of the new formula, which would favor a district like SFUSD, which is 1/3 Asian (many children of impoverished recent immigrants from China).

 
At Wed Mar 22, 12:05:00 AM, Blogger KC said...

Another possible factor is that SFUSD has made a significant effort to identify students who qualify for free and reduce lunch. I believe that is one of the data fed into the SCI regression. But it seems unlikely that this would cause such a significant change.

 
At Wed Mar 22, 04:53:00 PM, Blogger Eric Mar & SF Area Activists said...

sfusd is over 1/2 asian and pacific islander students.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008,