Friday, November 24, 2006

Undeserved PR black eye for SFUSD

Every year school districts have to give a state-mandated series of fitness tests to students. Results are reported for kids in 5th, 7th and 9th and usually wind up in some summary form in the press. The school district reports the results to the California Department of Education, which compiles them all and reports them to the world.

This year's SFUSD results looked kind of weird. A cursory glance at the statistics shows that there's an error. Look at the category for "flexibility" and you will note that 0 kids at every level are reported as passing that category.

Well, duh, someone at SFUSD or the CDE screwed up. Obviously it's not possible that zero kids passed the flexibility test. I asked a handy 7th-grader — an accomplished dancer — who said of course she passed it; it was easy. Any idiot can glance at the CDE chart and see that it's a bureaucratic screwup.

I learned about this silly and apparently inconsequential error a couple of days ago. But today I walk by a batch of newsracks at 19th and Irving, and see a headline on the mysterious San Francisco Daily screaming: "SF kids out of shape: Every 9th-grader failed test — educators are in disbelief." The story quotes dietitians and experts about how kids spend too much sedentary time and too much time on Playstations and yada yada.

Turns out the reporter who failed to notice that this was an obvious bureaucratic error works for Bay City News Service, which has presumably sent this story out far and wide. I called them (as a parent volunteer member of the SFUSD Student Nutrition and Physical Activity Committee). I am so sure they're knocking themselves out to send out a correction. But the headline is still sitting there on the newsstand.

Minor bureaucratic snafu multiplied by clueless reporting equals PR black eye.

And what a waste of a bunch of people's time doing all this testing, compiling, reporting etc. — plus the time of the reporter who failed to (duh) notice that it was an obvious bureaucratic error and called to interview sources, plus the sources', plus mine — sheesh.

Caroline

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008,