Wednesday, December 20, 2006

NCLB and strange bedfellows

Alexander Russo, who generally supports NCLB, approvingly notes that both the left and the right fid different reasons to oppose NCLB. He links to this National Review article: Leaving Behind Bad Federal Education Policy that makes the legitimate argument that the feds should keep their hands off education:
NCLB has reaffirmed the folly of federal meddling in local schools. Most notably, NCLB hasn’t significantly improved academic achievement across the nation.
Russo seems to think that disparate opposition to NCLB from the right and the left vindicates NCLB. I'm not so sure. I think both sides make valid points. I do not think it is healthy for either the state or the feds to usurp local control over schools. I also think that NCLB goes way beyond holding schools accountable by imposing impossible goals that are designed to weaken public schools and pave the way for future privatization. Centrists and others remains sold on the value of accountability and standards. It is interesting how this issue render the traditional left/right political axis moot.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008,