Monday, January 22, 2007

What's wrong with fundraising food sales at school?

The SFUSD Wellness Policy does not allow fundraising food sales on campus during the school day. This is a brief overview explaining why. For complete information, go to the website of the SFUSD Student Nutrition and Physical Activity Committee.

Here’s a summary of the rule, which has been in effect since the 2003-04 school year:
At all schools, K-12, teachers, staff, parents, and students may not sell any food or beverage at all during the school day. This includes bake sales, student stores, and classroom food sales. The only exceptions are for the four days per year when high school students are allowed to sell food, or through approved profit sharing arrangement with Student Nutrition Services (see www.sfusdfood.org for details)
Here are the reasons:
First, the SFUSD Wellness Policy’s “No Empty Calories” focus limits foods sold on campus during the day to approved nutritious items. That is because of our national obesity epidemic, which is devastating the health of today’s generation of youth, and a commitment to putting young people’s health ahead of money. State laws that take effect July 1, 2007, also put strict limits on junk food sales.

But even if only healthy foods are sold, there’s another important reason. The federally subsidized National School Lunch Program provides the "lunch-line" menus at all schools, offering free or reduced-priced lunch to low-income students. Other students pay full (though reasonable) price for those meals, or choose a la carte options from the Beanery. If more students buy those lunches, the income allows the quality of the cuisine to be improved for all students.

"Competitive food" sales at lunchtime drain money from the lunch-line and Beanery operations, which then reduces the quality of those meals and drives more students to the competitive operations in a downward spiral. When the lunch-line menus drop in quality because kids choose competitive foods instead, those who suffer are the most vulnerable kids – the younger children (since elementary schools don't have competitive sales) and the lowest-income kids, who can't afford the other foods being sold.

So, more kids eating the school lunches mean the school lunches get better. More kids eating the school lunches also enables more cafeteria staff to be hired, speeding up the lines.
Here are some facts about young people’s health:SFUSD Student Nutrition and Physical Activity Committee
January 2007

The photo, taken Jan. 17, 2007, shows the Galileo High School student store selling junk food at lunch, in violation of the SFUSD Wellness Policy.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At Mon Jan 22, 05:18:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

But some of that stuff in sold in our vending machines, what's wrong with that?

It's practically against the law to have monopolies by the way.

 
At Mon Jan 22, 07:31:00 PM, Blogger Caroline said...

If the vending machines at your school are selling Pop Tarts, chips, cookies and sweetened iced tea, they are also out of compliance with the SFUSD Wellness Policy.

Laws against monopolies apply to private industry, because competition in private industry benefits the consumer. Competition against the school meals program harms the consumers -- the students -- and it harms the most vulnerable students the most: the youngest and the poorest.

 
At Mon Jan 22, 09:39:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

some of that stuff....

So it would be ok for the kids to be selling the Pirate's Booty and the fruit snacks? Or even the vending machines... those are against the cafeterias and beaneries.

 
At Mon Jan 22, 09:41:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

P.S. Sweetened iced tea? ha, probably has just as much sugar as the "fruit juices" they have at school which is about the same as Coke.

 
At Mon Jan 22, 10:11:00 PM, Blogger Caroline said...

You can read the full policy and the list of approved foods (and the standards by which they're approved) at the www.sfusdfood.org website.

If you read the blog post to which you're responding, it should be clear that it's not OK for kids to sell snacks, and why.

It's true that the vending machines compete to some extent, but they are relatively low-volume. It's a tradeoff for having nourishment available to students outside the hours that the caf and the Beanery are operating. And they are required to be stocked with items that meet the Wellness Policy standards. It's the high-volume live sales that pose damaging competition to the caf and Beanery.

Here is an explanation from the www.sfusdfood.org website of the standards for drinks, which explain why the allowed fruit drinks are not the same as sweetened iced tea or Coke:

Why is 100% fruit juice allowed, even though it contains as much sugar as soda?
The focus of the district’s nutrition policy is not “low calorie”, but rather “no empty
calories.” Although fruit juice does contain sugar, all of the sugar in juices approved for
sale is “naturally-occurring” – that is, the sugar was contained in the fruit which yielded
the juice; those juice drinks which also contain added sweetener and water are not
allowed. Soda contains only empty calories, while 100% fruit juice contains nutrients
beyond the calories themselves. Orange juice contains vitamins A and C, thiamin, niacin,
riboflavin, protein, and may also be enriched with calcium; soda contains no nutrients
other than its calories. Pure fruit juice is also healthier for kids because of what it does
NOT contain – caffeine, phosphoric acid (which can leach calcium from bones), and
artificial flavors and colors, all of which are common ingredients in soda.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008,