Thursday, October 04, 2007

NCLB's impact: My bad! Do-over!

Some of the more-thoughtful right-leaning "Ed Reform" types have been questioning the effects of No Child Left Behind — relentless testing, focus on "the basics" to the exclusion of all else.

It's under discussion on Gerald Bracey's national Education Disinformation Detecting and Reporting Agency (EDDRA) listserve:

Jerry refers here to right-leaning public-education critics Checker Finn and Diane Ravitch:
In their book, Beyond the Basics, [it's more of a report, downloadable from the Fordham Foundation] Checker and Diane write this:

We should have seen this coming. We and others who have pressed for higher academic standards in recent years — particularly since the Charlottesville education "summit" set national education goals in 1989 — should have anticipated the "zero sum" problem that it would give rise to: more emphasis on some things would inevitably mean less attention to others. Insofar as we recognized this, however, we naively assumed that school days and years would expand to accommodate more of everything; that teachers would somehow become more knowledgeable; and that state and federal policy makers would insist on a balanced curriculum.

We were wrong. We didn't see how completely standards-based reform would turn into a basic-skills frenzy or the negative impact that it would have on educational quality (p. 6).
Duh. Or to respond more heatedly — a ticked-off teacher posted a response on the EDDRA listserve that I'm reposting with his permission.
Yes, Diane and Checker, YOU were wrong. But many, many of us, who, you know, actually teach in classrooms and work with real children every day, as well as many, many researchers and professors knew you were wrong and you told us all to kiss off and even went so far as to question our academic credentials. I see that you can't let that one go still; I caught the little dig "teachers would somehow become more knowledgeable". Bite me, Diane and Checker. I'm a little short of forgiveness for you at this point; the lives of my Title I students have been irrevocably tainted by the monstrosity that is NCLB and directly resulting from your playing footsie with the conservative politicians who made this happen, from Clinton to Bush. Too late in my book for an "Oops, my bad! — do-over!"

1 Comments:

At Wed Oct 10, 03:36:00 PM, Anonymous Tom Hanson said...

I found the most interesting aspect of this discussion the comments of Michael Petrelli, the VP for policy at Fordham, that even though the math tests are harder, scores are improving more in math than in reading. See:

http://www.openeducation.net/2007/10/09/nclb-proficiency-illusion/

Tom Hanson
Editor
OpenEducation.net

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008,