Tuesday, December 11, 2007

L.A. Times opens homework Pandora's box

L.A. Times 12/11/07
Columnist Sandy Banks:
To many parents, homework's a home wrecker
My column Saturday on the campaign by a San Marino mom to persuade school officials to cut back on "useless and ineffective" homework assignments uncorked a storm of bottled-up angst among readers, from Santa Monica to Pasadena to Orange County.

The woman I wrote about, Tracy Mason, said her middle-school daughter's homework load had crowded out sports activities, impinged on family time and turned their household into a battleground. She launched her less-homework campaign when she realized that her constant carping was poisoning their mother-daughter relationship.

"All of a sudden, they're hating you for being the homework enforcer and you're looking at it and thinking, 'This is just a bunch of crap anyway.' "

Her stance infuriated some parents in San Marino — a San Gabriel Valley suburb where the predominantly Asian American school district posts the highest test scores in the state. There, many parents want more homework for their children, not less.

But judging from the phone calls and e-mails I received, Mason has supporters in other places. Readers blamed homework overload for everything from childhood obesity to teenage suicide.

"We dread September," e-mailed Kimberly Frost of Santa Monica, mother of a Lincoln Middle School student. "Everything is put on hold. Our lives revolve around making sure our middle-schooler does his homework."From a family perspective, it is so detrimental." And the homework, she said, "is generally pure drudgery."

Frost was among about 50 parents who attended a PTA meeting on homework in Santa Monica last month. They heard accounts of research that shows that "burying our children in homework does not improve test scores," she said. "Anything over an hour a night starts to have the opposite effect [and] brings scores down."

But the research on homework is hardly conclusive. Some studies show that high school students who do more homework have slightly higher test scores. Others suggest that the type of homework matters more than the amount.

Most educators agree that 10 minutes per grade level — that would mean two hours a night for a high school senior — is about right. But what one student can finish in 20 minutes might take another an hour.

Because homework is considered a good way to promote responsibility, some districts require homework every night for even the youngest students. Carol Smith of Cerritos e-mailed me about her kindergarten grandson, who is in school from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., then has three or four pages of homework each night.

"I cannot understand why, when he's been involved in academic pursuits all day, they expect an hour of homework also," she said. "His solution is to rush through his work so he can play." He brings a full lunch box back home each day because he'd rather spend lunchtime on the playground than eat.

In the Orange Unified School District, Jim Stephens runs 23 early morning and after-school programs and keeps them free of academics, even though that sometimes means battling parents and teachers. He observes the fruits of our homework obsession in overweight and unhealthy kids.

"If I told you my child sat and spent three hours doing homework today, you probably wouldn't think that was awful," he said. "But if I told you my child had sat and watched TV for three hours, you'd probably be appalled. What's the difference physically?"

But not everyone feels buried by homework. An eighth-grader at Huntington Middle School -- the San Marino campus Mason's daughter attends — said she was "shocked" at the assertion that homework intrudes on family time. "I find it simple to get my homework done within an hour and a half (and I'm getting good grades) . . . and still have time to drive to Canyon Country most weekends to see my grandmother," e-mailed Maggie Moreton. When she read the column, "I thought GET OVER IT LADY. . . . The kid will get used to it."

And an engineer named Richard said Mason came off as "a typical brainless 'soccer mom' who would rather have her kids watch American Idle or some other brain-dead program than to teach them the importance of excelling in education." I'll presume his misspelling was an intentional dig at the television program. If not, Richard needs some spelling homework.

But most parents I heard from were like Susan Colletta, trying to make the best of the inevitable.She recalled a spring break when she took time off from work so she could spend it with her twins, high school students in Pasadena. "We had dreams of a trip to Disneyland, playing board games, working on a project or jigsaw puzzles. . . . Relaxing would be a word that comes to mind."

Instead, they spent spring break doing research for a 14-page biology assignment. Then, last summer: seven books to read, seven essays to write and 535 vocabulary words to study. Then came September: Two teachers announced they would each assign two chapters to be studied during the winter vacation. "My daughter came home in tears," Colletta said. "September 20-something, and the anticipation of Christmas was over."

As a mom who has watched her own children do math work sheets on a crowded plane headed for Thanksgiving in Ohio, diagram sentences on the beach during a Hawaiian vacation, and make note cards for essays while everyone else was clearing the Christmas dinner dishes, here's one Christmas miracle I'd like to see.No homework this holiday. Please.

sandy.banks@latimes.com

Labels:

1 Comments:

At Tue Dec 11, 07:59:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's essentially no such thing as a young kid (say, K-3) who is truant on his/her own. Those are dysfunctional families in which the caregivers don't get the kids to school. Those caregivers are also not coming to school and PTA meetings, reading the school district handbook, keeping up on the handouts sent home in the kids' backpack, joining the school listserve. And it seems likely that those kids are far more likely to end up truant on their own when they're old enough; I doubt if we need studies to confirm that.

The implication in other discussions has been that the schools are to blame for all that truancy, but I would like to see those blame-casters explain exactly, specifically what the schools are supposed to do to change those messed-up caregivers.

Further discussion has claimed that small schools are the magical miracle solution to high school truancy, but Nestwife has researched the figures showing that, as usual, it's not so simple:

Here are the latest truancy numbers for SF high schools, reflecting the 2006-07 school year. As you can see, there is no correlation between the size of the school and their truancy rate - it is the larger high schools which tend to have the lowest truancy rates.

Lincoln (enrollment 2343) truancy rate 15.32%
Washington (2306) truancy rate 14.09%
Galileo (2224) truancy rate 25%
Burton (1338) truancy rate 46.79%
Balboa (1098) truancy rate 32.33%
O’Connell (819) truancy rate 46.03%
Mission (864) truancy rate 68.98%
Wallenberg (647) truancy rate 22.57%
Marshall (642) truancy rate 36.92%
ISA (421) truancy rate 37.29%
June Jordan (371) truancy rate 67.65%

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008,