Cast your vote for Prop H spending priorities
The Prop H CAC has sent their recommendations for new spending to the BOE for a vote at the next BOE meeting on January 17th. In the poll I've listed many of the proposals that came before the committee, along with estimates of their cost. Unfortunately you'll have to be a member of the SfSchools list with a valid Yahoo! ID in order to vote. (And the blogger.com tool I use to publish this blog does not, as far as I know, support polls!)
Here are the choices in my poll:
- Green schoolyards (non-bond schools) $250,000
- Grants writer $90,000
- MS Bike Racks $15,000
- MUNI passes for homeless youth $120,000
- Teacher technology program $2,600,000
- School fiber connectivity $750,000
- Point-of-sale system for cafeterias $250,000
- Salad bar expansion $130,000 (not $262,500 shown in the poll)
- Teacher support and recruitment $546,000
- Program development project $250,000
- MUNI passes for MS and HS students $2,000,000
- Innovation seed funding $500,000
- Sustainability / Green schools initiative $100,000
- LEP Parent outreach coordinator $100,000
- PSAT / SAT preparation $174,000
- Whiteboards $500,000
- GATE $88,100
- Pre-K-3 literacy initiative $450,000
- Equitable Education for MS $640,000
- Culturally responsive initiative $250,000
Yet the Prop H CAC did not include the salad bar expansion in its recommendations to the BOE.
Let's hope the BOE corrects this mistake.
Meanwhile, go vote now!
Labels: Nutrition, SFUSD Politics

4 Comments:
The salad bar is one of the relatively rare items that parents/teachers/students -- people in schools, see as a need -- and district administrators similarly see as a need. So there should be unanimous support! I hope the Board of Ed gets that.
I don't think the Prop H Committee should have to be a rubber stamp for the Supt, but I do think the recommendations they made are out of whack with the strategic priorities he's trying to establish. I don't see how we can hold him accountable for what he says he will accomplish if we're not willing to give him the resources he says he needs to accomplish them.
The Supt doesn't seem to think that the woefully underfunded GATE program deserves more funding. I strongly agree with the Prop H committee that it does.
The BOE seems to have voted "None of the Above" and put the $6.5M into reserve for unforseen expenses (read "raises").
Post a Comment
<< Home