Friday, June 26, 2009

Progress on truancy

The Chron recently published an article, Pressuring parents helps S.F. slash truancy 23% and an editorial, Fighting truancy yields big dividends with news of progress of efforts to combat truancy at SFUSD. From the editorial:
Nearly three years into her battle against school truancy, District Attorney Kamala Harris has something to celebrate: There was a 23 percent drop in the number of elementary school truants at San Francisco schools this year. On the simplest level, that drop means more money for the city: The school district received an additional $372,862 in funds tied to attendance. Any additional money for education is something to be celebrated in these tough times. And on the grandest level, everyone in the city benefits when children go to school.
We've been following this story from the begining so it is nice to see this follow up and to note the successes. As the reporting makes clear, progress has so far been limited to the lower grades. A nice start, but the harder problem of truancy in the upper grades, remains more or less unchanged. Hopefully the sustained attention on the problem will help officials find new answers. Prosecuting parents is not likely to work for older kids. Garcia speaks of making school "more joyful" for these truants, which may be noble, but in the context of reaching the dropouts most at risk here, the increasingly hackneyed "joyful learning" term comes off as risible. The success so far comes more from sticks than carrots. Garcia is probably right that the district needs to find ways to engage those older truants that are on the dropout path, programs like the Center for Academic Re-entry and Empowerment, (CARE) that we've noted before. But the success of those programs also relies on enforcement — paying attention to the problem, intervening, and letting these kids know that they can't just slip through the cracks.

Also, note that there are question marks surrounding some of the data provided by the district to back up this story. Caroline takes a look at some of the anomolies over on her Examiner blog in: SF schools' supposed truancy numbers make no sense. What's going on? Hopefully we'll get answers from the district, and improved data and reporting from the schools.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At Wed Jul 15, 02:25:00 PM, Anonymous kat whiteley said...

Times have so changed. I remember when I was young I missed school all the time without any backlash. Then my mom went into drug rehab
and got cleaned up and I couldn't get away with it. Of course, when I skipped school I followed in my mothers' footsteps and developed a drug problem which luckily the same drug rehab
fixed. Taking care of truancy helps everyone across the board. Way to go on slowing it down.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008, September 2008, October 2008, November 2008, December 2008, January 2009, February 2009, March 2009, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009,