Does Bay Area Rep. George Miller support harming Calif. schools? One blogger thinks so
The rest of this post is from Fordham’s Flypaper blog, by Mike Petrilli, who points out that there’s only one absolute requirement for states to apply:
“
States that don’t permit schools to use student achievement data when making teacher tenure or evaluation decisions need not apply.
It’s not apparent why this is more important to the Obama Administration than, say, lifting charter school caps, or embracing merit pay. But two things are clear. First, it pokes the teachers unions straight in the eye. ... Second, it pokes California straight in the eye, as it is the only state that is indisputably disqualified as a result of this provision. ...
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has promised to change California’s laws to bring it into compliance, though California teachers unions aren’t happy about that.
But here’s my question, again: Why did this issue rise to the level of an eligibility requirement? And why pick on California?
I have two theories. (Actually, I have one theory, and a friend of mine has another.) My theory: George Miller, the chairman of the House Education and Labor committee, is having fun yanking California’s chain, and the CTA/NEA’s chain as well. Miller, a liberal from the Bay Area, has a long history of driving his own state’s officials bonkers, especially around teacher issues. He’s also probably still mad at the NEA for making such a stink about merit pay when Miller’s NCLB reauthorization bill was floated back in 2007. ...
There’s no way that the Administration published the Race to the Top application without running it by Miller; I wouldn’t be surprised if his office pushed the Department to be as tough on California over the firewall issue as possible. At the least, he signed off on it. And he doesn’t regret it; he said in a statement to the LA Times: ” “I hope states that don’t presently meet the eligibility will decide to take the steps necessary to meet it. It’s the right policy to take our education system to the next level.”
... Here’s what’s interesting: Most members of Congress try to bring home the pork to their home states and districts. (That’s one issue that’s surfaced around healthcare reform—how to keep Congress away from Medicare reimbursement rate decisions.) But here’s George Miller, proud California citizen, doing what he can to keep the Golden State from winning the Race to the Top. (Or, more fairly, trying to browbeat it into changing its laws in order to qualify.) Someone should ask a political scientist to make sense of that."

5 Comments:
Miller has back peddled a number of issues and is still singing the sad "teacher accountability" song that should be applied, instead to politicians. He is not a friend to education - he is a friend to himself. MisterWriter
If one blogger thought Caroline was harming CA schools should we trust that too?
Fordham Institute is a big player, so it's not like any old random blogger.
Fordham blogs in support of standards, testing, and charter schools, so should we accept those as well?
Personally I see nothing wrong with standards, testing and Charters.
Standards provide a baseline level of knowledge expected to survive and prevent programs like NCLB from "dumbing down" expectations just so everyone can feel good about themselves. The traditional grading system includes the grading/scoring level "F" which stands for FAIL for a reason. Not everyone should succeed just to avoid dealing with the root causes of poor performance (challenged home environment, poor community engagement, failing school systems).
Testing is how achievement is measured against standards. How else would we measure whether we are meeting a successful standard achievement level?
Charters provide an option for families who may be looking for something a little different that the Publicly funded system. Everyone should support the rights to choice.
Post a Comment
<< Home