Friday, July 31, 2009

Does Bay Area Rep. George Miller support harming Calif. schools? One blogger thinks so

The Fordham Institute, a right-leaning education think tank, claims that the Obama administration’s Race to the Top program for schools aims specifically at harming California — and that it does so with the blessing of liberal East Bay Rep. George Miller, an architect of the reviled Bush-era No Child Left Behind legislation.

The rest of this post is from Fordham’s Flypaper blog, by Mike Petrilli, who points out that there’s only one absolute requirement for states to apply:


States that don’t permit schools to use student achievement data when making teacher tenure or evaluation decisions need not apply.
It’s not apparent why this is more important to the Obama Administration than, say, lifting charter school caps, or embracing merit pay. But two things are clear. First, it pokes the teachers unions straight in the eye. ... Second, it pokes California straight in the eye, as it is the only state that is indisputably disqualified as a result of this provision. ...
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has promised to change California’s laws to bring it into compliance, though California teachers unions aren’t happy about that.
But here’s my question, again: Why did this issue rise to the level of an eligibility requirement? And why pick on California?
I have two theories. (Actually, I have one theory, and a friend of mine has another.) My theory: George Miller, the chairman of the House Education and Labor committee, is having fun yanking California’s chain, and the CTA/NEA’s chain as well. Miller, a liberal from the Bay Area, has a long history of driving his own state’s officials bonkers, especially around teacher issues. He’s also probably still mad at the NEA for making such a stink about merit pay when Miller’s NCLB reauthorization bill was floated back in 2007. ...
There’s no way that the Administration published the Race to the Top application without running it by Miller; I wouldn’t be surprised if his office pushed the Department to be as tough on California over the firewall issue as possible. At the least, he signed off on it. And he doesn’t regret it; he said in a statement to the LA Times: ” “I hope states that don’t presently meet the eligibility will decide to take the steps necessary to meet it. It’s the right policy to take our education system to the next level.”
... Here’s what’s interesting: Most members of Congress try to bring home the pork to their home states and districts. (That’s one issue that’s surfaced around healthcare reform—how to keep Congress away from Medicare reimbursement rate decisions.) But here’s George Miller, proud California citizen, doing what he can to keep the Golden State from winning the Race to the Top. (Or, more fairly, trying to browbeat it into changing its laws in order to qualify.) Someone should ask a political scientist to make sense of that."

5 Comments:

At Fri Jul 31, 10:43:00 PM, Blogger MisterWriter said...

Miller has back peddled a number of issues and is still singing the sad "teacher accountability" song that should be applied, instead to politicians. He is not a friend to education - he is a friend to himself. MisterWriter

 
At Sat Aug 01, 08:49:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If one blogger thought Caroline was harming CA schools should we trust that too?

 
At Sat Aug 01, 11:52:00 AM, Blogger caroline said...

Fordham Institute is a big player, so it's not like any old random blogger.

 
At Sun Aug 02, 09:18:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fordham blogs in support of standards, testing, and charter schools, so should we accept those as well?

 
At Wed Aug 12, 11:05:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Personally I see nothing wrong with standards, testing and Charters.
Standards provide a baseline level of knowledge expected to survive and prevent programs like NCLB from "dumbing down" expectations just so everyone can feel good about themselves. The traditional grading system includes the grading/scoring level "F" which stands for FAIL for a reason. Not everyone should succeed just to avoid dealing with the root causes of poor performance (challenged home environment, poor community engagement, failing school systems).
Testing is how achievement is measured against standards. How else would we measure whether we are meeting a successful standard achievement level?
Charters provide an option for families who may be looking for something a little different that the Publicly funded system. Everyone should support the rights to choice.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008, September 2008, October 2008, November 2008, December 2008, January 2009, February 2009, March 2009, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009, August 2009,