Wednesday, February 28, 2007

School Board Notes 2.27.06

School Board Notes 2.27.06
By Nicole Achs Freeling
Greatschools.net Correspondent
  • Small Schools Policy Adopted
  • Proposed Bayview Charter Denied
  • New Round of Union Negotiations Begins
  • Public Input Sought in Superintendent Search
Small Schools Policy Adopted

After several years of controversy over how much to support small schools, the board adopted a comprehensive policy Tuesday night that lays out a framework for creating and supporting small schools by design. These are schools characterized by limited enrollment, personalized instruction and unique educational approaches. Through the policy, existing schools or groups hoping to start new schools can apply to develop a small school by design (SSD). SSDs will have greater autonomy in budgeting, staffing and developing curriculum than traditional schools.

The policy passed Tuesday night was a broad yet detailed document that laid out specifics of how the schools would be defined, established, supported by the district, assessed and governed, and what level of autonomy they would have in relation to the district. A last-minute change that would have given the superintendent greater control over small school policy caused a dust-up with many of the community members involved in developing the proposed policy.

"Don't, at the 11th hour, remove the teeth, the details, that make this policy effective," said Shane Safir, chair of a task force of community members commissioned to draw up the policy. She urged the board not to cede authority over development of small schools.

However, the level of specificity in the policy led some to question whether it exceeded the board's reach. Commissioner Jill Wynns, in particular, was concerned about the policy. She has often questioned whether the cash-strapped district can afford small schools.

A push by Wynns to adopt the superintendent's version was rebuffed, and the board ultimately unanimously approved the original version. They did agree, though, to have further discussions as to the authority of the superintendent in regulating SSDs. Many board members hailed the policy as a breakthrough that will serve as a model for districts across the country. "This is a big culture shift for us," Commissioner Hydra Mendoza said.

The push for small schools began five years ago when board members, including current commissioners Mark Sanchez and Eric Mar, began championing them as a way to close the achievement gap and recruit more students. Others, however, including Wynns and former superintendent Arlene Ackerman were less enthusiastic. In 2005, the district's lukewarm support led the Gates Foundation to pull funding it had offered to develop small schools.

Last June, however, the board passed a resolution stating its support for small schools and establishing a task force to develop a small schools policy. That task force used best practices culled from urban districts like Boston and Philadelphia to develop the policy the board adopted.

Proposed Bayview Charter Denied

The board voted to deny a charter for the proposed Bayview Essential school of Music, Art and Social Justice, asking the community members who had supported the school to try to develop it as a small school within the district instead. In just the first two months of this year, the district has considered three new charters. It has denied them all so far.

District staff, which recommended denial, said the school, with signatures of 23 proposed students, didn't demonstrate it had the support to build the class sizes it wanted. There was also concern about how adequately the school could meet the needs of English language learners, envisioned as making up about half the student body, and whether there would be enough local leadership of a school operated by CES, a company that develops charter schools nationwide.

Supporters of the charter says CES has a history of running successful small schools that help under-performing students. A CES representative said the school came with $400,000 in grant funding, considerably more startup cash than most charters. "We're offering an opportunity to create a model of small school practices."

Board members instead urged the community to create the school within the framework of the district under the new small schools policy.

New Round of Union Negotiations Begins

With memories of tense negotiations that almost led to a teachers' strike less than a year ago, the district opened a new round of negotiations with the union for a contract to cover 2007 to 2010. The initial proposal laid out few specifics other than to begin the negotiations; however, several members of the teachers union appeared to ask for one specific change: that paraprofessionals be given the same rights as teachers with regard to paid time off for jury duty, bereavement leave and binding arbitration to protect jobs. The board has established a Committee on Labor Relations to help smooth negotiations. It will meet Thursday, March 1, at 4 p.m.

Public Input Sought in Superintendent Search

District leaders are working to gather public input that will help them select a new superintendent. Search leaders are holding public meetings, convening focus groups and collecting questionnaires that will be used to draw up a "leadership profile" of the qualities the community would like to see in the new superintendent. The board hopes to interview candidates in April and make an offer by the end of May.

The district has posted a questionnaire on its Web site that people can fill out to express their opinions. The form asks what people value in the schools, what needs to be changed, and what qualities they feel are most important in a district leader. The questionnaire is also being sent to every household with students in the district. The district will be gathering input at community meetings:
  • March 3, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., Thurgood Marshall High School in Bayview
  • March 17, 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Martin Luther King Middle School in Bayview
  • March 17, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., School of the Arts in Twin Peaks

Labels: ,

Piping Hot Ed Blogs

It's been pretty quiet around here for various reasons. Which, since I am a geek, gives me some time to tinker. I've been experimenting with Yahoo! Pipes, a new service from Yahoo who's motto is "Rewire the web" which is what I've been doing with my Ed blog feeds. I took a bunch of my favorite blogs and ed news sources and poured them into one "pipe" and sorted them by date. The result is the mix of stories you see below. You can always see what it finds as the top stories right here.

Pipes is a new tool. It has some rough edges, and lots of enhancements are needed. But it's pretty simple to mash up your own pipe. Enjoy.

G-Town Talks writes: Teacher’s Rule or Principal’s Rule?

As the high school principal, I feel personally responsible for everything that happens in our building. Everything. So what to do, and I KNOW every principal will relate to this post, when teachers have complaints about school rules? Let’s use cell phones and MP3 players for an example. (And…

This Week in Education writes: Reporter Refutes Claims Of Junk Journalism

Refusing to knuckle under to the bullying views of know-nothing education bloggers like Kevin Carey and me , a brave education reporter named John Krupa from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Northwest takes on the notion that, in this case at least, the Wall Street Journal's recent story on…

NYT publishes: Face Book: A Fighter for Colleges That Have Everything but Status

As an independent college counselor, Loren Pope’s passion lies in promoting the virtues of small, little-known liberal arts colleges.

NYT publishes: Justices Hear Arguments on Autism-Case Dispute

The Supreme Court heard an appeal that will clarify the rules that prevent parents of children with disabilities from appearing without a lawyer.

This Week in Education writes: New America Takes Old View Of For-Profit Universities

New New America higher ed guy Stephen Burd takes an unfortunately predictable and under-nuanced swipe at the University of Phoenix and for profit higher ed companies in general in his post Fed Up at the University of Phoenix . In the piece, Burd rehashes the discredited NYT story from earlier this…

The Quick and the Ed teases: Bogusness Questioned

This Week in Education writes: Girls Like Them

I'm just starting to sift through all the great work that's collected at Listen Up!, but this first video, " A Girl Like Me ," already lets me know that there's lots of powerful stuff here. Broadcast on NPR in the fall, A Girl Like Me (2nd from the top) shows young African…

Joan Jacobs writes: It’s all about them

Gen Y college students are number one in narcissism, concludes a new study, “Egos Inflating Over Time.” Self-esteem has social costs, notes the Los Angeles Times. People with an inflated sense of self tend to have less interest in emotionally intimate bonds and can lash out when rejected or…

Joan Jacobs writes: Teachers vs. JROTC

At a 5,000-student, nearly all Latino high school in Los Angeles, the Junior ROTC program has lost nearly half its cadets in recent years, reports the LA Times. Some Roosevelt High teachers are trying to get the program dropped. Teacher Gillian Russom said (color guard drill) training instills the…

EduWonk writes: Perfect Storm?

Continuing the movie meme, ETS has a new report out, America's Perfect Storm: Three Forces Changing Our Nation's Future . If you follow this issue it's nothing you haven't read/heard before, skills, economy, and demographics. Still worth checking out though the demographic section…

Eduwonk writes: An Inconvenient Truth

I'm pretty sure that it was the moment when the huge Teach For America screen banner and the picture of Sherry Lansing in a classroom during TFA Week came on the TV screen that Oscar night stopped being so much fun for all the folks who make at least part of their living beating on TFA. An open…

EdWise writes: Teacher Voices

A new New York City teacher blog, Teacher Voices, makes it debut with a timely piece on the problem of school safety. It is written by a Staten Island high school English teacher with a lively writing style, and is well worth a look.

EduWonk writes: Matt V. Mickey

Matt Yglesias and Mickey Kaus are doing something many political candidates don't want to: They're debating firing teachers. Though I think this specific issue -- "tenure" and firing teachers -- gets much more play than it deserves (the real underlying problem is a culture that…
And that is my small contribution to the ongoing efforts to rewire the web. Again. I've lost count...

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

ScSchools Calendar

Yes, we have a calendar full of events. Yes, we forget to publicize this resource. Check out this week's events, and remember, you can always access this calendar via our sidebar links! Enjoy:

Tuesday, February 27
2007 Youth & Family Budget Campaign!
6:00 PM - 8:00 PM
459 Vienna off Persia
HELP FAMILIES STAY AND THRIVE IN SF--JOIN THE 2007 YOUTH & FAMILY BUDGET CAMPAIGN!

Get involved and advocate for children and youth in the San Francisco city budget. Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth will hold an organizing meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 27, 6-8 p.m., at Coleman's offices, 459 Vienna off Persia in the Excelsior.

Information: nlee@colemanadvocates.org or call 239-0161x13.
BOE Regular Meeting
6:00 PM - 11:00 PM
Everett Middle School
Regularly scheduled meeting. Check SFUSD web site to confirm and to review the agenda
Wednesday, February 28
Community Music Center's monthly faculty-student jazz jam
Thursday, March 1
BOE Buildings, Grounds, and Services Committee Meeting
Friday, March 2
A Collaborative Model for Advocating For Your LD Child
8:30 AM - 11:00 AM
Fort Mason Center, Building D, Room 100
Parents Education Network

A coalition of parents collaborating with educators and the community
to help bring academic success to students with learning and attention
difficulties.

Speaker Series Event – Open To Parents & Educators!

A Collaborative Model for Advocating For Your LD Child

Co-presented By:
James Adams, Licensed Educational Psychologist
Brian Inglesby, School Psychologist

Advocating for a child with a learning disability can be a complex and confusing endeavor. Brian Inglesby and James Adams will share a model of collaboration that involves all individuals in a child's life – the child, teacher(s), siblings, tutor, parent(s), relatives, etc. They will discuss expected outcomes from such a collaborative approach and explore some possible challenges that parents may encounter during the process.

Friday, March 2, 2007
8:30am, Coffee & Registration
9:00am – 11:00am, Speaker Event
Fort Mason Center
Building D, Room 100
Free Parking Outside Front Gates! Low-Cost Paid Parking Inside Fort Mason!
Free to PEN Members
$25 Non-Members
(includes one-year membership to PEN)
RSVP REQUIRED!
pen"at"parentseducationnetwork.org (415) 751-2237

www. parentseducationnetwork. org
Schoolmaters of the Year banquet
6:00 PM - 10:00 PM
Napa Elks Lodge 2840 Soscol Avenue Napa, CA 94558
No-Host Social 6 PM and Dinner 7 PM
Saturday, March 3
SFUSD Districtwide Parent Conferences
9:00 AM - 3:00 PM
Thurgood Marshall High School (45 Conkling St in the Bayview)
SFUSD DISTRICTWIDE PARENT CONFERENCES: The San Francisco Unified School District is hosting two districtwide Parent Conferences this year, in an effort to reach more parents. The first will be held Saturday, March 3, at Thurgood Marshall High School (45 Conkling St in the Bayview). Location for the Saturday, March 24, conference will be Roosevelt Middle School (460 Arguello St in the Richmond district). The conferences are designed to provide critical information to help families successfully partner with our schools for academic achievement.
San Francisco Family Summer Resource Fair
10:00 AM - 3:00 PM
Bill Graham Civic Auditorium, 99 Grove St. at Polk
SAN FRANCISCO FAMILY SUMMER RESOURCE FAIR: Saturday, March 3, 10 a.m.-3 p.m., Bill Graham Civic Auditorium, 99 Grove St. at Polk. Mayor Gavin Newsom's second annual San Francisco Family Summer Resource Fair is a FREE convention-style showcase of everything for children, youth, and families to do when school is out this summer. Parents with children will find information from 200 organizations providing summer programming for San Francisco children—camps, classes, activities, services—in San Francisco and beyond. Last year's inaugural event was a great success with 160 exhibitors and 4,000 parents in attendance. Coordinated by the Department of Children, Youth and Their Families. Find details at www.dcyf.org and click on the blue Events button.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

2007 Newberry and Caldecott award winners

The Newbery and Caldecott book awards were announced recently. The winners are:

Newberry Award: The Higher Power of Lucky by Susan Patron, illustrated by Matt Phelan (Simon & Schuster/Richard Jackson)

Caldecott Award: Flotsam by David Wiesner (Clarion)

Frankly the only reason I noticed the awards is due to the word "scrotum". Apparently many people are greatly offended by one occurance of word in The Higher Power of Lucky. Scrotum? They must be kidding...

Thursday, February 15, 2007

School Beat on re-upping NCLB

This week's School Beat column takes aim at the upcoming NCLB reauthorization debate: Son of NCLB
In other words, this [Commission on No Child Left Behind] hopes to make NCLB even more punitive, filled with more impossible goals, and even more divorced from reality. The message is clear. Public education is still in jeopardy under the current administration.

Labels:

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Sub's Kafkaesque nighmare gets worse

Earlier we briefly noted the plight of a substitute teacher in Connecticut facing jail time because the spam infested PC in her classroom exposed some of her students to porn. I made light of the story figuring that sanity would prevail. Clearly it was not the teacher's fault.

The story is no joke. She has gone to court and been convicted. Now she really does face jail time. See these articles in the Washington Post or Ars Technica for the low-down.

Sometimes I complain that SFUSD IT policies are too restrictive. My kids tell me they cannot reach many site, including Wikipedia, from school computers. A story like this makes it clear why IT managers would err on the side of safety.

School Board Notes 2.13.07

School Board Notes 2.13.07
By Nicole Achs Freeling
Greatschools.net Correspondent
  • Mayor Proposes City/District Partnership
  • Tech Union Demands Wage Increase
  • Timeline for Finding New Superintendent
  • Problems, Hopes at Horace Mann
  • Former Board Member's Travel Expenses Questioned
Mayor Proposes City/District Partnership

It is a rare occurrence for a sitting mayor to publicly address the Board of Education, and even rarer for it to happen under collegial circumstances. But Tuesday, Mayor Gavin Newsom appeared before the board to pitch a "Partnership for Achievement" that would lay a framework for collaboration between the city and school district in working to improve the schools.

At a time when mayoral takeovers of school districts are grabbing headlines, Newsom's initiative would allow the city and district to work more closely together and pool resources, while respecting the line of governance between the two.

"This is not about governing or creating policy, but setting up a framework where we all respect our roles," Newsom told the board.  "If we have a plan, we can support you in making tough decisions in a proactive way, not in a reactive way like we did last year," he said, referring to his objection to the board's decision to close schools, specifically merging John Swett Elementary into John Muir Elementary.

The city, Newsom said, has more than 60 departments and almost everyone provides services that has some connection to youth and education. From shared facility maintenance to greening the schoolyards, "we haven't scratched the surface of what we can do in collaboration.

Board members and acting Superintendent Gwen Chan were full of praise for the plan, which will come to the board for a vote at its next regular meeting, February 27.

Newsom's office has long been working to build a closer relationship with the district. He hired Hydra Mendoza to serve a liaison between the city and BOE, a post she continues to hold while serving on the board.

The partnership was created with input from the board members and Chan. It identifies six strategic areas:
  • A marketing campaign to showcase school programs and professionals
  • Initiatives to recruit and retain educators, including a plan by the mayor to help teacher's retire student loans and get low-cost home loans
  • Use of local funds to expand services that will help students come to school healthy and ready to learn
  • Increased investment in early education, after-school programming, collaborative wraparound services and violence-prevention programs
  • Strategies to prepare students for the modern workforce, such as the development of career pathways in competitive workforce areas
  • Alignment of facilities planning efforts to develop “hubs” to share in creating safe neighborhoods and community centers
Tech Union Demands Wage Increase

Members of the union representing information technology professionals at the district said that after five years without pay increases it was time for the district to negotiate with members and increase their wages. Information technology employees have not had an across-the-board pay increase since 2001, and now make almost 30 percent less than employees in comparable posts working for the city, representatives said. The union met with District Labor Relations Manager Tom Ruiz in January. The district would not negotiate with the group under former Superintendent Arlene Ackerman, but it changed its position under Chan and agreed to meet with members, according to the union's newsletter. So far, however, district officials have said they don't have the money to fund the increase the union is asking for, which would bring its salaries in line with those of city employees.

"It goes deeper than equal pay for equal work," Frank Morales, an IT professional who has been with the city since 1980, told the board. In the central office alone, he said, eight people have left for better pay elsewhere. Those employees have not been replaced, he said. "Their responsibilities and duties didn't leave with them but got heaped on the remaining employees." Burdensome workloads have made it difficult to meet federal and state reporting requirements, he said, and "morale is devastated."

Timeline for Finding New Superintendent

The board has set May 17 as its target date for finding and making an offer to a new superintendent, Commissioner Hydra Mendoza told the public, recapping discussions that have been held in committee. The district will spend the next month and a half soliciting public input that will be used to create a profile of the qualities the community values in a leader. The board hopes to interview finalists May 10 to 12, and make a final choice the following week. "It's a very aggressive timeline, but one I feel we can meet," Commissioner Mendoza said.

Commissioner Eric Mar announced that the district is establishing an interactive Web site, also available in Spanish and Chinese, that will allow people to respond to a questionnaire about what they want from their schools and from a superintendent.

Problems, Hopes at Horace Mann

A report by the state intervention team charged with monitoring the progress of Horace Mann, an under-performing middle school that has been under state sanctions since 2004, said the school is working hard to put rigorous teaching programs in place but is still struggling with several intractable problems. District representative DeeDee Desmond reported that 84 percent of incoming sixth-graders are below grade level in math and language arts, a problem she attributed to the current student assignment process. Staff turnover has also been a problem, Desmond said. The school has had three principals in three years, and 14 of the school's 32 instructors are new to teaching.

"Horace Mann was a high-achieving school when we were using a race-based assignment process and should be considered when we have that discussion," Commissioner Jill Wynns observed.

School officials are hopeful the Horace Mann may qualify for funding under a recent legal settlement between the California Teachers Association and the state that will bring $2.9 million to under-performing schools. Some 23 schools in SFUSD are eligible. There is enough money to fund about a third of the schools in the state that qualify; The state has committed to funding one school in each county, then allotting the rest through an application process.

Former Board Member's Travel Expenses Questioned

A consent calendar item pulled from the last general meeting questioned a request to reimburse former Commissioner Dan Kelly for $12,474 of expenses incurred traveling on district business. At issue were not the expenses themselves, which were all deemed legitimate, but that they dated back to 1992.

"Making reimbursements that date back that far seems unreasonable," said Commissioner Jane Kim, who proposed reimbursing expenses up to three years ago, the legal statute of limitations.

"I'm concerned about where this money is coming from," Mendoza said. "It's a significant amount of money that could impinge on what's going to school sites."

Other members, however, said that since the board currently has no rules specifically articulating reimbursement of expenses, it was not fair to make those rules and apply them retroactively.

"There are some extraordinary circumstances with this person, and I don't think it's fair to expect us to apply rules that don't exist," Commissioner Kim-Shree Maufus said, adding that it was important to establish some rules as soon as possible.

Board members ultimately approved the expenses, with Jane Kim casting the sole dissenting vote, but agreed to look into setting rules regarding reimbursement of expenses. Typically, board members have paid their own way on trips or had the trips funded by charitable groups unless they were traveling as representatives of the district, as Dr. Kelly had been on all the occasions in question. Commissioner Wynns pointed out he had paid his own expenses on numerous occasions.

Labels: , ,

The Educator Roundtable opposition to NCLB

The Educator Roundtable is a group of "parents, scholars, and policy analysts" who have organized to oppose the upcoming re-authorization of NCLB. Interestingly, they are not affiliated with any of the more visible interest groups associated with the NCLB. They are not related to any think tanks, unions, or other educational policy groups. They appear to be a truly grass-roots effort.

They are circulating a petition that I have included below that you can sign here. To me the petition makes a solid case for opposing NCLB based on its false premises and its pro-privatization, anti-public school agenda. The full text of the petition is here:
We, the educators, parents, and concerned citizens whose names appear below, reject the misnamed No Child Left Behind Act and call for legislators to vote against its reauthorization. We do so not because we resist accountability, but because the law's simplistic approach to education reform wastes student potential, undermines public education, and threatens the future of our democracy.

Below, briefly stated, are some of the reasons we consider the law too destructive to salvage. In its place we call for formal, state-level dialogues led by working educators rather than by politicians, ideology-bound "think tank" members, or leaders of business and industry who have little or no direct experience in the field of education.

The No Child Left Behind Act:
  1. Misdiagnoses the causes of poor educational development, blaming teachers and students for problems over which they have no control.
  2. Assumes that competition is the primary motivator of human behavior and that market forces can cure all educational ills.
  3. Mandates data driven instruction based on gamesmanship to undermine public confidence in our schools.
  4. Uses pseudo science and media manipulation to justify pro-corporate policies and programs, including diverting taxes away from communities and into corporate coffers.
  5. Ignores the proven inadequacies, inefficiencies, and problems associated with centralized, "top-down" control.
  6. Places control of what is taught in corporate hands many times removed from students, teachers, parents, local school boards, and communities.
  7. Requires the use of materials and procedures more likely to produce a passive, compliant workforce than creative, resilient, inquiring, critical, compassionate, engaged members of our democracy.
  8. Reflects and perpetuates massive distrust of the skill and professionalism of educators.
  9. Allows life-changing, institution-shaping decisions to hinge on single measures of performance.
  10. Emphasizes minimum content standards rather than maximum development of human potential.
  11. Neglects the teaching of higher order thinking skills which cannot be evaluated by machines.
  12. Applies standards to discrete subjects rather than to larger goals such as insightful children, vibrant communities, and a healthy democracy.
  13. Forces schools to adhere to a testing regime, with no provision for innovating, adapting to social change, encouraging creativity, or respecting student and community individuality, nuance, and difference.
  14. Drives art, music, foreign language, career and technical education, physical education, geography, history, civics and other non-tested subjects out of the curriculum, especially in low-income neighborhoods.
  15. Produces multiple, unintended consequences for students, teachers, and communities, including undermining neighborhood schools and blurring the line between church and state.
  16. Rates and ranks public schools using procedures that will gradually label them all "failures," so when they fail to make Adequate Yearly Progress, as all schools eventually will, they can be "saved" by vouchers, charters, or privatization.

Labels:

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Ron Pang and Sandra Leigh, Co-Schoolmasters of The Year

Ron Pang, Principal of Abraham Lincoln High School, and Sandra Leigh, Principal of Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy, are being honored as Schoolmasters of The Year. There will be a banquet to honor them scheduled for March 2nd, at the Napa Elks Lodge. Beyond that, little is known about the award or the banquet. So I contacted the district for more information, which led me to this short biography of Principal Ron Pang:
I didn't grow up wanting to be a teacher. As a person with severe learning disability, I constantly struggled in class to keep up and spent more time in the principal's office than I would like to admit. It was a teacher who recognized something that I didn't see in myself that pulled me from that office.

That was my epiphany and has been a guiding principle for my entire career. I challenge myself everyday to not only recognize all 2350 students by name, but to see his or her strengths and to use them toward their success.

Born and raised in our 50th State, I received a bachelor's and a master's degree from the University of Hawaii. I taught special education students at all three levels for six years before moving to California in 1978, joining a private day care institution as an educational therapist before being asked to work for the San Francisco Unified School District as a middle school special education teacher.

One persistent administrator, Helen Chin, convinced me to get an administrative credential "just in case", and I received my second master's from San Francisco State. Unexpectedly, I was offered a school assistant principal position that led to principalshsip at that same middle school in two and a half years. Talk about coming full circle!

It was our current Superintendent Chan who persuaded me to leave middle school and to move to Abraham Lincoln High School, where I have been principal for some eight years. It is through her belief in me that I have become not only a better and wiser administrator, but also a better and wiser person.
Congratulations to Ron and Sandra. If and when I hear more about this award, I will post it here.

Labels:

Where have all the KIPPsters gone?

The Chronicle's Chip Johnson wrote yesterday about the leaky roof at Oakland's KIPP Bridge College Preparatory, a serious problem with no easy solution. The building can't be reroofed during the rainy season.

Johnson repeats the usual praise of KIPP:
"... considered a model for education reform ..." "... its 450 students in fifth through eighth grades achieve higher scores than their counterparts ..." "... most of the students at KIPP Bridge School are academically beyond their peers in the public schools."
And he gives a rather soft-pedaled account of KIPP's disciplinary system:
"...students are required to walk single-file, candy is not allowed, and students and parents are asked to sign a contract and stick to it."
Johnson obviously didn't intend that column to take a close look at the KIPP school itself. But it would be useful if he has more background before he writes about it again, because the facts about KIPP and especially about that particular school are pretty startling. This blog post, which I'll send to Johnson, restates some points that I've posted here previously. For the record, I'm an amateur volunteer San Francisco public-school parent, volunteer and advocate, and I study charter schools and other "it's a miracle!" education reforms with a skeptical eye.

KIPP issue No. 1: Stratospheric attrition, especially of the most academically challenged subgroup

The most startling KIPP attrition statistic I've seen comes from KIPP Bridge, where 77% of the African-American boys in one class (the class that would finish 8th grade in 2006) left KIPP Bridge between 5th grade and the fall of 8th grade. It's not publicly known how many of the remaining 23% finished 8th grade and moved on to high school.

I've followed enrollment figures for all nine of California's KIPP schools. Six of them show the same pattern: very high attrition, far higher for the most academically challenged subgroup. (This is usually African-American males, but it's Latino males in some schools with small African-American enrollment. KIPP schools tend to be very segregated.) Oakland's KIPP Bridge shows the highest attrition of all.

Here are the figures for KIPP Bridge's class that finished 8th grade in 2006:
Total enrollment, all demographics:
87 students started 5th grade in 02-03;
60 continued to 6th grade in 03-04;
50 continued to 7th grade in 04-05;
36 continued to 8th grade in 05-06.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Those are fall statistics, so we don't know how many actually finished 8th grade and were promoted to high school.
Similar pattern for the class that is to finish 8th grade in 2007:
82 started 5th grade in 03-04;
78 continued to 6th grade in 04-05;
47 continued to 7th grade in 05-06;
number who finished 8th grade unknown.

African-American boys:
35 started 5th grade in 02-03;
19 continued to 6th grade in 03-04;
15 continued to 7th grade in 04-05;
8 continued to 8th grade in 05-06.
Again, those are fall figures, so we don't know how many finished 8th grade and were promoted to high school. This means 77% of the African-American boys who started at this KIPP school either left or were retained to repeat a grade (this is unknowable unless KIPP chooses to tell us) by the FALL of 8th grade. We also don't know, unless KIPP chooses to tell us, how many of those eight finished 8th grade and went on to high school.

38 started 5th grade in 03-04;
31 continued to 6th grade in 04-05;
17 continued to 7th grade in 05-06.

African-American girls:

38 started 5th grade in 02-03;
30 continuted to 6th in 03-04;
22 continued to 7th in 04-05;
15 continued to 8th in 05-06;
number who finished 8th grade unknown.

31 started 5th grade in 03-04;
33 were in 6th grade in 04-05 (this bump could reflect some retained from the grade ahead to repeat 6th, or newcomers);
17 continued to 7th grade in 05-06.

As an amateur doing this on my own unpaid time, I haven't researched attrition for non-KIPP schools serving comparable demographics. Boatloads of money have been poured into studying KIPP schools (too bad some of those megabucks couldn't pay to fix the leaky roof). One would presume that some of that money would pay for someone to do those comparisons. If so, I haven't seen the results anywhere.

KIPP supporters have defended this attrition by pointing out that low-income families often have unstable living situations and move frequently, a sadly valid point. But it's not clear why 56 percent of African-American girls would move away as compared with 77 percent of African-American boys.

To point out the obvious: any school that loses 77 percent of its most academically challenged subgroup, its true target students, is not solving the problems of public education. And any school that could keep 23 percent of a subgroup and disappear the rest could easily see that subgroup's achievement soar, no matter what pedagogical methods it used.

Again, six of California's nine KIPP schools show a similar attrition pattern.

KIPP issue No. 2: Discipline procedures

Candy bans and walking single file are the least of it (why do I suspect that KIPP tries to make that sound like the full extent?). KIPP's discipline system relies on shunning and public humiliation.

The punishment system, called The Bench, is for violations from physical aggression and vandalism to untucked shirt, chewing gum or talking to a benched student. It lasts for two days if the benched miscreant does everything right.

My information comes from the KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy handbook. I understand that this is fairly standard in KIPP schools.

Transcribed from the KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy handbook [bracketed sections are my inserts]:
If a student makes one of the poor choices [listed infractions], he or she must be "off the team" and is subjected to the following until earning his/her way off:
  • No talking, except to staff (freshmen and sophomores) [KIPP refers to its students, who are in grades 5-8, as freshmen through seniors, and the student body as a team].
  • Wearing a bench sticker
  • Loss of all privileges
  • Silent lunch away from the team
  • Detention from 5-5:30
  • Grade level appropriate letter explaining why s/he should be accepted back to the team
  • Participation in a family meeting [it's not clear whether this means the student's family or is referring to the school community as a family] (in all cases except talking to bench student, gum, and untucked shirt)
  • One or more logical consequences as decided by teacher/admin...
  • Public apology at Grade Level Team and Family (juniors and seniors)
Meeting with Student Discipline Committee (SDC) where they review the student's apology letter and decide whether s/he should be off the bench...

[If the SDC and/or asst. principal so decide, the student is benched until another review the following week.]

[There are also time-outs, with a time-out space in each classroom.]
Needless to say, this discipline system is controversial among those who are aware of it (given that KIPP doesn't exactly trumpet it far and wide as a secret to success). Some view it as oppressive and racist that middle-class observers would admire a disciplinary system used on low-income children of color that most would never tolerate for their own kids. Others say kids from different cultures need and expect different types of discipline.

KIPP issue No. 3: Grade retention

It's clear to anyone who follows news and discussion about KIPP schools that they are very aggressive about requiring that students repeat a grade. All KIPP schools that I know of are grades 5-8, and all that I know of are in districts where all or most of the feeder schools are grades K-5. This would imply that KIPP schools are set up to expect many incoming students to repeat grade 5, and to weed out those who refuse.

Various reports and enrollment figures also hint that many kids are retained to repeat grades.

I took my 7th-grader to visit KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy last September. We were curious because of its high test scores, and also because a KIPP parent had posted proudly on the sfschools listserve that his child had "tested into" the KIPP school. KIPP is not supposed to be requiring students to test into its schools.

What the KIPP staff told me immediately was not to assume that my daughter would remain in 7th grade if she enrolled there; she would be in the grade they assigned her, based on testing. In our all-choice district, I checked out several schools when we first started looking at middle schools, and I NEVER got a comment like that. The attitude outside KIPP is that it's assumed that your child remains at grade level except under specific, unusual circumstances.

So, this raises many questions, few of which I've seen addressed.

How many students does KIPP require to repeat a grade, compared with non-KIPP schools (including students who completed 5th grade elsewhere and are required to repeat it at the KIPP school)? Does requiring students to repeat a grade weed out challenging students, and if so, how many? Is repeating a grade likely to improve a student's test scores? Does that extend to long-term improved academic — and life — success?

I would hope that the researchers who are paid to study KIPP schools know to examine all those questions. But media covering KIPP schools should also be aware of all these issues and be asking those questions too — though not necessarily in a story about leaky roofs.

By the way, though, aside from the money poured into studies of KIPP, it appears to be showered with private funding — Bill Gates, Don Fisher, Eli Broad, the Wal-Mart folks &mdash everyone loves KIPP. Isn't there any way to direct a little of that money to fixing the roof at KIPP Bridge?

— Caroline

How to research California KIPP schools' enrollment data:
Go to the California Department of Education's Academic Performance Index website:

Near the top, click Data & Statistics
Click Dataquest
Level — choose School
Subject — choose Student Demographics (under Enrollment)
Submit
Single year — leave the default, 05-06
Name — just type KIPP (this will get you to all California KIPP schools)
Click the "gender, grade, ethnic designation" option
Select agency — now you can choose one KIPP school after another with that and the back button
You can change the year to get year-by-year figures. After that it's just a laborious process of carefully writing them down.
Most California KIPP schools began in 03-04 and so only have three grades. The Oakland one began in 02-03 and graduated its first 8th-grade class (or what was left of it!) in '06.

There aren't figures for this school year yet.

Labels:

Friday, February 09, 2007

Balboa JROTC Drum Corp on YouTube

All of a sudden we've got YouTube fever here. I looked around for SFUSD related videos and found this documentary about the Balboa JROTC drum corp's victory in a recent competition:



If you know of any other YouTube videos about school kids in SF, please send me a link.

Update: I stand corrected. Bal was not victorious in this event. Musta been a different day...

School Beat covers Balboa's Grab N Go program

Dana Waldow gives up an update on the efforts to provide healthy breakfasts to students at Balboa and other pilot schools in this week's School Beat column: Got Breakfast? Grab n Go Triples Participation at Balboa High School
San Francisco’s Balboa High School is in the second year of a pilot Grab n Go breakfast program which has succeeded in increasing participation in school breakfast among a population which is notoriously averse to starting the day with a healthy meal — teenagers. The convenience of Grab n Go makes it a winner with kids.
Last September she reported on the debut of this program in this blog post: Grab n Go Breakfast is a hit at Balboa High School. At the time they were hoping to feed 200 students per day. They've exceeded that goal by a long shot. This is great news not only for the Balboa community but for other schools as well. The success of Balboa's pilot program is already inspiring other schools to follow their lead.

The success of the grass-roots, bottom-up efforts to reform school food service is both remarkable and inspirational. The volunteers like Dana who have taken up this challenge have been faced by recalcitrant bureaucrats, unfavorable regulations from the district up through the feds, and the always-desperate scramble for budget dollars. Yet they are making a differnce and getting results in a remarkably short time frame, precisely because they are starting small and demonstrating an easily replicated forumla for success. Congratulations to all involved, especially Dana. How many other reform ideas could learn from this model?

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Slate: How to improve the dreaded parent-teacher conference

This Slate article, How to improve the dreaded parent-teacher conference presents a modest proposal that might even make sense: Invite the student and make it a three-way conversation.

Interesting...

UESF PR: Looking Forward

The UESF gets all web-2.0-ish by posting a PR piece over on YouTube. Check it out: Looking Forward

Nice use of the new medium.

Catering trucks: Why they're a problem

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors is considering legislation to limit catering trucks to a 1500-foot distance from schools.

Why is it a problem when catering trucks sell food to students right outside schools?

A Q&A for students (and adults too)

This is a brief overview. For complete information on school food in the San Francisco Unified School District, go to the website of the SFUSD Student Nutrition and Physical Activity Committee.

Catering trucks compete with the school meals program and the district-run a la carte food sales (called Beaneries in SFUSD). “Competitive food sales” at schools are a nationwide concern because they mean more unhealthy food and drinks sold to students, contributing to the national obesity crisis and its related harmful effects. Competitive sales also drain money away from school meal programs. That means the quality of the food in the lunch line suffers. And that impacts the most vulnerable students: the youngest, the poorest, and many disabled students. Those are the students who have no options besides the lunch-line meals (which must meet federal nutrition standards, and in SFUSD must meet the district’s higher nutrition standards). K-5 students' only options are the lunch line or bringing food from home, while low-income and some disabled students' options are limited by money and accessibility.

In SFUSD, when competitive sales cause budget shortfalls in Student Nutrition, that comes out of the school district budget — in other words, the needs of schools, classrooms and students. So competitive sales hurt students and schools in various ways, and hurt the most vulnerable students the most.

But shouldn’t students have choices?


Students with money to spend want choices, but they may not understand the harmful impact on students who don’t have money to spend. Students with money to spend already have the luxury of choosing food options in most middle and high schools. To help cover the cost of running the school meal program, Student Nutrition Services operates the Beaneries, which offer choices like sandwiches, burgers, and salads in addition to the regular school lunch. The wealthier students may buy food from the Beaneries or vending machines, or can bring food from home — and may patronize “profit-sharing” food sales (which are student fundraising sales of restaurant-style foods held in conjunction with the district’s Student Nutrition department).

Many students share a commitment to being mindful of the greater impact of their actions — even minor actions such as purchasing an item made by sweatshop labor. In the case of competitive foods, few students realize that the impact hits our own community, harming the most vulnerable students — the youngest, the poorest and often disabled students. And when sales drop, cafeteria workers can lose their jobs.

If restricting competitive sales results in more money coming in to the Student Nutrition department, the food choices at school will improve. Nearly 60% of SFUSD students qualify for free or reduced-priced meals, and over 21,000 students eat those meals every day. For many of them, the school breakfast and lunch are the only meals they get all day. Should they have to eat poorer-quality food, or smaller servings, because wealthier students want more choices?

What if the catering trucks only sell healthy food?

Even if the trucks sold nothing but organic tofu and sprouts, they would still compete with the school meal programs, draining away money needed to provide meals to needy students and improve the school food for all students.

Additionally, there is no way schools can monitor what catering trucks sell. Some already claim that their offerings are “healthy”, but they sell donuts, Twinkies and snack cakes, drinks that are mostly high fructose corn syrup and water, and hot entrees which are far higher in fat than cafeteria offerings, along with their yogurt and fruit.

My school barely has a lunch program, so we need catering trucks.

Schools wishing to provide more lunch offerings should have the principal request that SFUSD Student Nutrition Services expand the lunch service, rather than assuming that outside vendors should be brought in.

Why call for a 1500-foot distance from schools? That’s a long way.

Some SFUSD high school sites are so large that a shorter distance — measured from the front door — would still allow trucks alongside the building. And trucks that move across the street or down the block, close enough to attract a rush of students, may pose a neighborhood nuisance and a traffic hazard. Catering trucks that are in view of the school are likely to lure students — which is also a problem at closed campuses where students aren’t supposed to leave.

But this would hurt the vendors, and they’re small-business people.

The school district’s priority must be what’s in the best interests of students — especially the most vulnerable students — not the cash flow of an unrelated business enterprise (often one from outside the city).

What about vending machines and corner markets? Don’t they sell junk and compete with the meal program too?


Vending machines in SFUSD are required to stock only healthy items from a district-approved list. As to competition, it’s a matter of degree. Vending machines do low-volume business that poses minimal competition, and they have the advantage of making food available at off hours, such as after school when many students remain on campus for extracurricular activities. And there’s nothing to be done about corner markets, while it’s feasible to limit the unreasonable competition posed by catering trucks driving right up to the schools.

Why is our meal program so short of funds, anyway?

The government reimburses the school district for meals for low-income students, but school districts nationwide get the same amount (except for Hawaii and Alaska, which get a higher rate because of their high cost of living). But the government funding falls short in San Francisco, because the cost of living and the cost of labor here are the nation’s highest — much higher than even Hawaii and Alaska. SFUSD also has a policy of providing a free meal to hungry students who come to the cafeteria with no money, even if they haven’t qualified for government reimbursement (often because their families haven’t filled out the forms). Few, if any, other school districts have the same “no child left hungry” policy.

If school food were better, students wouldn't buy food from the trucks.

A few years ago, SFUSD meals were largely “carnival-style” food, heavy on corn dogs, French fries and packaged, processed apple turnovers. Today’s school food is tastier, more nutritious and healthier, with less fat, more whole grains and fresh fruit, and better quality meat, as well as a wider variety of entrees. However, better food costs more! Students often wish the meals included organic fruit. Unfortunately, a regular apple costs about 15 cents, while an organic apple costs about 26 cents. The food can continue to improve only if Student Nutrition Services has more money to do it. It’s a step in the wrong direction when students flee to catering trucks, because that diverts money away from Student Nutrition, which means there’s less money to make the food better.

Even students who don’t want to buy food at school might want to consider working to bring more money into SNS so that school food can be improved. Apart from patronizing the cafeteria, here are some ways to help:
  • buy bottled water at school. Most Americans don’t drink enough water, and the brain is one of the first organs to be affected by dehydration. Student Nutrition profits from each bottle of water sold in the cafeteria or Beanery. To avoid the line at lunch, buy water before school during breakfast service in the caf.
  • write to federal and state legislators, asking that the money the government provides for school meals in San Francisco be increased to reflect the higher cost of labor here,
  • contact the Board of Education and the Board of Supervisors to ask that funds from Prop. H be designated for higher-quality school food
  • ask the Board of Education to make school nutrition a high priority, including enforcement of the Wellness Policy, and to make sure that better nutrition is a high priority during the search for a new Superintendent.
A good place to start learning more about school food is School Food in the SFUSD: A Short History, on the www.sfusdfood.org website.


San Francisco Unified School District Student Nutrition and Physical Activity Committee
February 2007


— Caroline

Labels:

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Chron profile of Gwen Chan

The chron profile interim superintendent Chan in Interim S.F. schools chief takes charge.

I've heard much of her home-grown story before through the grapevine, but I had not seen it in print before. She has a long and distinguished record of accomplishment at every level in the district, and I think she has done a very good job in her 'interim' role.

The kicker for me though is learning her excellent taste in dogs. I am officially a totally biased observer now. My Angel recently passed away, probably from cancer, so I know very well why she would occasionally want to leave her headaches behind and be with her JoJo.

Let's hope she perseveres through the superintendent search. If someone better comes along, great. But that someone would have to be pretty impressive to best hometown girl Gwen Chan.

Labels:

School Board Notes 2.5.07

School Board Notes 2.5.07
By Nicole Achs Freeling
GreatSchools.net Correspondent

Superintendent Search Begins

The board, meeting as a Committee of the Whole, took its first steps toward finding a new Superintending, working with search firm Hazard, Young, Attea and Associates to make several important decisions about the process.

The biggest issue was whether to conduct a confidential or open search. The latter would allow community input in the final decision but, search executives say, would discourage many qualified candidates from seeking the post because they don't want it known they would consider leaving their current position.

In the last search for a Superintendent, the names of some of the candidates were leaked by, according to Commissioner Jill Wynns, members of the Community Advisory Council. "Your district does have some history where confidentiality was not maintained and, quite candidly that's going to hurt you," said Bill Attea, partner in the firm Hazard, Young, Attea and Associates, which is leading the search.

Attea told the board that the most qualified candidates usually request confidentiality. Those the least concerned with it, he said, tend to be not currently employed, are from another field, or are serving in a lower-level capacity so even their consideration for the post would be seen as an honor.
"We've never had any sitting superintendents who have gone public with their candidacy" before a job offer was made, Attea said. "We have had several situations where there was a leak and the candidates withdrew their applications."

The Committee decided to hold a confidential search with the possibility of making the process open to public input in the very final stages, subject to the candidates being willing to have their names revealed. It also decided to solicit a large amount of input on the front end. Over the next two months, the search firm will hold stakeholder focus groups and a number of public meetings to gather public opinion on what San Francisco residents want from their schools and their new superintendent. One proposed forum was an upcoming Parents Conference, sponsored by local community-based organizations, to be held on March 5.

The board will convene a Citizens Advisory Council of at least 20 members including youth, parents, advocacy group representatives, union leaders and other stakeholders. The CAC will be charged with taking the report generated from the public engagement process and using it to develop a list of criteria the search firm will use in finding candidates. "These will be our marching orders, the criteria we're going to measure every candidate against," Attea said.

The firm wil then publicize the search and begin recruiting. It will ultimately come up with a short list of 12 to 15 candidates, and then narrow that down to about five for the board to interview. The board is looking to search for, decide on, and make an offer to a candidate by the end of May. Interim Superintendent Gwen Chan's contract expires in June.

Wynns, the only board member to have already presided over a superintendent search, shared a problem encountered during the last search, when the board did not review the applicants' resumes until the finalist candidates were presented. Several of the people recommended as finalists, she said, "were unacceptable to us because they would have been unacceptable to the community." The board asked to review all the applications of serious candidates, not just those on the search firm's short list.

Labels: , ,

Kim's note on SFUSD superintendent search

The Greatschools.net notes are coming up next, but I think Kim's notes on the same meeting are interesting and compliment them nicely. Lots of details on which public figures and groups will play a role in the upcoming process.

Check them out.

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Proposition H spending plans

School Beat has an excellent take on the wrangling between the BOE and BOS over Prop H in Meeting the Letter and the Spirit of Proposition H:
For our schools and our City to thrive, the partnership with the City must be stronger. The achievement of our educational mission demands it, and the stresses of the socio-economic inequalities within which our students, their families and our schools exist require it. For a City like San Francisco that claims to be grappling with long-standing inequality among its residents, schools are both the place where those inequalities are clearly apparent and around which we can begin to try to change the status quo.
For more background on the debate, see the Chron's School board's marathon spend-a-thon and the Ex's In-kind aid beats cash for schools, supes say

Labels:

May 2005, June 2005, July 2005, August 2005, September 2005, October 2005, November 2005, December 2005, January 2006, February 2006, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, August 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, September 2007, October 2007, November 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008,